Best White-Label AI Receptionist for Agencies 2026
The best white-label AI receptionist for most service agencies is Trillet Agency: $299/month includes 3,000 AI minutes, unlimited client workspaces, 10 numbers, a custom domain, branded email, and custom markup. Synthflow is a strong Enterprise option for teams that value a mature visual builder. Stammer is compelling for agencies combining chat and voice. ConvoCore offers multi-channel breadth, while Thinkrr and Assistable are strong GHL-oriented choices. Low-cost wrappers such as Vapify, Voicerr, and ChatDash make sense when provider choice matters more than consolidating accounts; VoiceAIWrapper now offers both a built-in engine and a bring-your-own-key mode.
The ranking should follow the agency's business model: speed to onboard, client experience, total operating cost, support ownership, and evidence for regulated work. Architecture matters because it shapes those outcomes, but it should not replace them.
Why the Market Is Shifting from "Platforms" to "AI Receptionists"
Local businesses buy outcomes: fewer missed calls, booked appointments, qualified leads, and after-hours coverage. They rarely care which orchestration API or speech model is underneath.
That changes the agency requirement. A strong reseller product needs a branded client experience, repeatable onboarding, isolated workspaces, usage and markup controls, reliable integrations, and support that can trace a problem across the service. The best platform is the one an agency can package, price, and operate profitably.
The product promise is also easier to scope than “AI automation.” An agency can define which calls the receptionist answers, what it can book or update, when it transfers, which details it captures, and how the client reviews outcomes. That turns technical capability into a service-level conversation.
A strong package combines the agent, number or routing setup, business-hours rules, knowledge maintenance, one or two integrations, monthly reporting, and a clear usage allowance. Complex outbound campaigns, custom software work, regulated workflows, and after-hours escalation can then be priced separately. The platform should make those boundaries visible rather than forcing the agency to estimate from several disconnected dashboards.
The Comparison Table
| Platform | Current public pricing | Classification | Best for | Important diligence point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trillet | Studio $99; Agency $299 | First-party voice AI application | Finished branded agency service | Telephony is separate; BAAs use Agency/Enterprise process |
| Synthflow | Enterprise from about $30,000/year | First-party application | Mature no-code and visual workflows | White-label commercial terms are quote-dependent; Stripe reselling was removed |
| Stammer AI | Pro White Label $99 | First-party application | Combined chat and voice offering | No included minutes; voice usage is about $0.11-$0.17/min |
| ConvoCore | White Label $199; Elite $349 | Hybrid | Multi-channel agency delivery | 5% fee on agency margin; confirm Vapi-connected versus managed v3/SIP route |
| Thinkrr | Annual-effective $32, $166, or $416/month tiers | First-party GHL-oriented application | GHL-focused agencies | White-label add-on price is not publicly disclosed |
| Assistable | $225/3 subaccounts; $450/10; $975 unlimited | First-party GHL application | Deep GHL workflows | $0.07/min headline excludes the language model; $97 Solo has no white label |
| Frontdesk | White-label starts at $500/month (pricing FAQ) | First-party application | Packaged receptionist resale | White-label page now redirects to a referral form; $54.99 wholesale figure unverified |
| Wrapper route | From $28-$29/month plus upstream usage | Third-party portal over provider | Low fixed cost and provider choice | Commonly adds a separate provider account, bill, and support boundary |
Public pricing changes. Verify checkout, renewal, usage, seats, numbers, and contract terms before quoting clients.
Trillet: Best Packaged AI Receptionist for Agencies
Trillet is a first-party voice AI application, not a reseller portal for Vapi, Retell, or Bland. Agencies use one standard Trillet commercial and support relationship for the hosted product, while Trillet still uses disclosed subprocessors for telephony, models, speech, and cloud services.
Studio at $99/month includes 1,000 AI minutes, up to 3 client workspaces, 3 numbers, and branding on a Trillet-hosted address. Agency at $299/month includes 3,000 AI minutes, unlimited workspaces, 10 numbers, custom domain, branded email, custom markup, and priority support. Additional AI usage is $0.12/min and telephony is separate. Both plans offer a card-required 7-day trial.
The operational advantage is a ready agency layer: branded workspaces, inbound and outbound agents, Crews for multi-agent workflows, billing controls, integrations, and usage visibility. Trillet displays SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 evidence. BAAs follow the standard process on Agency and Enterprise; regulated suitability still depends on the workflow and contract.
Honest trade-off: developer platforms such as Vapi and Retell can deliver lower raw costs and more component control for teams with engineers. GHL-first agencies may also prefer tools embedded more deeply in that ecosystem.
What sets Trillet apart
The Agency allowance covers a useful early portfolio: ten clients averaging 300 AI minutes each remain inside the 3,000-minute allowance. Unlimited workspaces prevent the subscription from rising merely because the agency adds a low-usage client. Custom markup and branded communications support a consistent resale offer, while Crews lets agencies coordinate specialized agents where one general receptionist is not enough.
Where Trillet falls short
Studio is deliberately capped at three workspaces, so a growing agency should budget for Agency rather than treating $99 as its long-term unlimited price. Telephony is not included in the AI-minute price. Teams whose competitive advantage depends on choosing every model, speech engine, and turn-taking parameter may prefer developer infrastructure.
Synthflow: Best for a Mature Visual Builder
Synthflow is an established first-party application with sophisticated no-code workflow tooling. Its current public Enterprise positioning starts around $30,000 per year. White-label terms are quote-dependent, so agencies should verify whether an add-on applies or is included in the quoted package.
Synthflow removed its in-product Stripe reselling capability in September 2026. That does not remove its white-label product, but it means agencies should map client billing and usage presentation before committing.
Best for: established teams that value visual workflow design and can justify an Enterprise contract.
What sets Synthflow apart
Synthflow has a mature no-code product and recognizable enterprise positioning. A visual builder can help operations teams explain branching workflows to clients and edit them without maintaining a custom application. That is valuable when call logic is highly structured and the organization already has review and testing processes.
Where Synthflow falls short
The current public entry point for Enterprise is far above self-serve agency subscriptions. The removal of in-product Stripe reselling means an agency must confirm how customer billing will work. Obtain one quote that clearly states white-label access, included features, usage, implementation, support, and renewal terms rather than combining figures from different public pages.
Stammer AI: Chat-First Platform with Voice Add-On
Stammer's Pro White Label plan, $99/month as of October 2026, offers an accessible route for agencies selling multiple conversational channels. It includes five chat and five voice agents (extra agents $10/month each) but no included minutes. Voice is priced by model at about $0.11 to $0.17/min.
Stammer is a first-party application. Use of telephony, model, or speech vendors does not make a platform a wrapper. Its practical advantage is consolidating chat and voice under one agency experience.
Best for: agencies whose product bundle genuinely needs both web chat and phone reception.
What sets Stammer apart
One branded environment for chat and voice can simplify training, sales, and account reviews. The $99 white-label entry point is accessible compared with enterprise-only products, and sub-account wallets let clients pay the agency directly for usage at agency-set rates.
Where Stammer falls short
An agency focused only on phone outcomes should decide whether the combined channel product adds value or complexity. Model the published $0.11 to $0.17 voice range using the model quality clients will actually receive. Request current security evidence and contract terms for regulated work instead of assuming a general privacy statement covers the deployment.
ConvoCore: Best Hybrid Multi-Channel Option
ConvoCore promotes voice plus messaging channels and, as of October 2026, publicly lists White Label at $199/month (20 sub-accounts, 60,000 credits) and White Label Elite at $349/month. Its billing documentation adds a 5% fee on the agency's resale margin. Its architecture has included a Vapi-connected route requiring Vapi credentials and a newer managed v3/SIP stack.
That makes ConvoCore a hybrid. Do not describe it as entirely native or entirely a wrapper without confirming the chosen route. Ask who owns the upstream account, bills voice usage, supports incidents, and controls the production agents.
Best for: agencies prioritizing multi-channel breadth and willing to validate the deployment model.
What sets ConvoCore apart
Voice and messaging in one agency offer can be useful when lead response moves between phone, WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, or Telegram. Its public fixed price is also approachable for a smaller agency.
Where ConvoCore falls short
The Vapi-connected and managed routes have different account, billing, and support implications. Require an architecture diagram for the proposed setup and reconcile the $199 and $349 plans with credits, sub-accounts, usage, telephony, the 5% margin fee, and white-label entitlements. Do not use older per-seat or per-minute claims that are not supported by the current public record.
Thinkrr: Best for GHL-Oriented Packaging
Thinkrr's current public annual-effective tiers are approximately $32/month base, $166/month for three subaccounts, and $416/month for unlimited subaccounts. The price of its white-label add-on is not public, and public terms and marketing need clarification during diligence. As of October 2026 its pricing page states that GoHighLevel is not required; the GHL integration is optional.
Its real strength is GHL-oriented agency delivery. Teams already standardized on GHL may value ecosystem fit more than a small difference in platform price.
What sets Thinkrr apart
The product is designed around workflows many lead-generation agencies already use. Reducing integration work can be worth more than a marginally lower minute price when onboarding, follow-up, and reporting are already standardized inside GHL.
Where Thinkrr falls short
The white-label add-on is not publicly priced, so the visible base and subaccount tiers do not establish the complete agency cost. Public marketing and terms have also required clarification. Get the white-label fee, usage, included features, data terms, and cancellation provisions in writing before calculating client margins.
Assistable: Best for a GHL-Native Product Layer
Assistable lists $225/month for three subaccounts (where white label and re-billing start), $450 for ten, and $975 for unlimited subaccounts with 50 concurrent calls; a $97 Solo tier has no white label. As of October 2026, its $0.07/minute headline covers orchestration and standard text-to-speech only, with the language model billed on top. A 14-day trial was not found on its current pricing pages; verify the live terms before quoting clients.
Assistable is a first-party GHL application, not a generic wrapper. Its workflow integration is a genuine advantage for agencies that want the receptionist embedded in their existing CRM operations.
What sets Assistable apart
The tier structure makes client capacity explicit, and the unlimited tier publishes 50 concurrent calls. Its public rate sheet itemises orchestration, text-to-speech, language model, and telephony charges, which makes usage easier to model before testing CRM tags, workflows, booking, transfers, and reporting.
Where Assistable falls short
The advertised $0.07/minute figure excludes the language model and telephony, so it should not be quoted as an all-in voice rate or anchor a multi-year margin promise. The $225 plan covers three subaccounts, and growing agencies should model the ten-account and unlimited tiers. GHL orientation is an advantage only when it matches the agency's operating model; custom API integrations require developer work.
Frontdesk: Best for a Packaged Receptionist Model
Frontdesk, previously marketed as My AI Front Desk, says in its pricing FAQ that white-label partner plans are custom and start at $500/month. As of October 2026 its former white-label page redirects to a referral form, so public detail on domains and subaccounts is thin. A separate $54.99 wholesale receptionist figure appeared on a vendor page in August 2026 but has not been re-verified. Verify the quote before building a margin model.
Frontdesk is a first-party application. Its strength is a focused receptionist product that can be easier to explain to local-business buyers than a general-purpose voice platform.
What sets Frontdesk apart
A narrowly packaged receptionist offer can shorten the sales conversation and reduce implementation choices. Agencies that want a recognizable unit to resell may prefer that structure to configuring a general developer platform.
Where Frontdesk falls short
The current white-label starting price and the separate $54.99 wholesale figure should not be combined without vendor confirmation. Ask what constitutes a unit, what usage is included, how additional clients scale, and which branding, support, and billing controls the $500 starting tier contains.
Wrappers: Best for Low Entry Cost and Provider Choice
Wrappers provide a branded agency portal connected to one or more upstream platforms:
- Vapify: $29, $69, $149, and $399; supports Vapi and Retell.
- Voicerr: live $28 Pro headline; supports Vapi and Retell. Higher historic prices are reported by third parties but are not the current public headline.
- VoiceAIWrapper: now a two-mode platform rather than a pure wrapper. As of October 2026 its built-in engine needs no upstream account and bills on one invoice (about $0.07 to $0.31/min, telephony extra), while an optional bring-your-own-key path connects Vapi, Retell, or ElevenLabs, billed by the provider. Plans are Pay as You Go ($0, one client account included, +$20 each), Scale ($499), and Custom.
- ChatDash: about $100, $250, and $500/month on annual billing; supports Retell, Vapi, and ElevenLabs, with a separate HIPAA add-on around $200.
The trade-off is usually two commercial relationships: the wrapper subscription and the upstream provider account. That can add reconciliation and support handoffs. It can also provide flexibility to change providers. Multi-provider support should not be assumed to mean automatic failover; test the process.
What sets wrappers apart
An agency can get a branded portal at a very low fixed cost while retaining access to developer platforms it already knows. VoiceAIWrapper's bring-your-own-key path across Vapi, Retell, and ElevenLabs is useful for teams that want provider choice, and its built-in engine avoids the second account. Vapify's tiered agency services and GHL orientation may reduce setup work. Voicerr's public headline is inexpensive enough for a market test.
Where wrappers fall short
Provider flexibility does not remove the need to maintain credentials, reconcile usage, or coordinate support. Some settings and agents may not transfer cleanly between providers. Compliance evidence must cover the wrapper and connected provider path. Before onboarding many clients, test a provider change, export usage, and document which company owns each class of incident.
For the full architecture comparison, see voice AI wrapper vs native platform and wrappers vs integrated platforms.
Why Wrapper Platforms Are a Risk for AI Receptionist Agencies
The risk is operational rather than a claim that every wrapper is unreliable. A classic wrapper adds a portal vendor to the upstream voice provider, which commonly means another contract, invoice, credential set, and support handoff. Provider changes can also affect features or costs exposed through the portal.
Agencies can manage that risk by documenting incident ownership, reconciling both bills, testing exports, and confirming whether provider switching is manual or automatic. Wrappers remain attractive for low fixed cost and provider choice; the agency simply needs an operating process for the extra boundary.
AI Receptionist Margin Examples
At 10 clients using 300 AI minutes each, Trillet Agency's 3,000-minute allowance covers the full 3,000 AI minutes. The platform cost is $299 before telephony and other variable services. At $400/client, revenue is $4,000 and contribution before carrier, support, sales, taxes, and other operating costs is $3,701.
At 20 clients using 300 AI minutes each, total AI usage is 6,000 minutes. Trillet Agency costs $299 plus 3,000 overage minutes at $0.12, or $659 before telephony and other variable services. At $500/client, revenue is $10,000 and contribution before those costs is $9,341.
These are contribution examples, not promised gross margins. Real profitability must include numbers, carrier rates, transfers, support time, payment fees, sales commissions, software, refunds, and taxes.
How to Package an AI Receptionist for Clients
The platform becomes easier to sell when the agency converts it into a defined service. A basic package might include one inbound receptionist, one number or forwarding route, business-hours and after-hours behavior, a knowledge base, lead capture, call summaries, and one booking or CRM integration. State the included AI minutes and the price for additional usage.
A higher tier can add multiple departments, bilingual handling, advanced transfers, payment or intake workflows, outbound follow-up, priority changes, and a more demanding reporting cadence. Regulated workflows should be scoped separately because contract review, access controls, retention, and client procedures require more work than adding a badge to a sales page.
Separate setup work from recurring service. A setup fee can cover discovery, prompt and knowledge preparation, integration, testing, routing, consent language, and staff training. The monthly fee covers the platform allocation, monitoring, updates, reports, and support. This structure makes the value visible and protects the agency from treating every customization as part of an unlimited subscription.
Define change limits as well. Business hours and FAQ edits may be included, while a new location, integration, department, or outbound campaign triggers a new scope. Record who approves prompt changes and who is responsible for the accuracy of business information. Clear operating rules improve margins more reliably than a small difference in per-minute price.
Questions to Ask Every Vendor
Ask the same questions in writing so answers can be compared without relying on demos:
- What exactly is included in the plan, allowance, overage, telephony, number, seat, and concurrency price?
- Which client-facing elements can use the agency's domain, brand, email, reports, and support links?
- Who contracts with and bills the upstream carrier or voice provider?
- What happens when usage exceeds an allowance or a payment fails?
- Which data is stored, for how long, in which region, and by which subprocessors?
- Which audit evidence and agreements apply to this plan rather than an Enterprise plan?
- How are production incidents escalated, and what status information can the agency share?
- Can prompts, knowledge, logs, recordings, numbers, and usage data be exported?
- Which advertised features are generally available, beta, roadmap, or delivered through a third party?
The strongest vendor is not the one that answers “yes” to everything. It is the one that states boundaries clearly enough for the agency to price and support the service.
How to Evaluate a White-Label AI Receptionist Platform
1. Build a demo agent and call it
Build a real client agent and test appointment booking, qualification, after-hours handling, transfers, unknown questions, and failure recovery. Score task completion, not only voice naturalness.
Use a repeatable script of at least ten calls. Include interruptions, spelling a name, changing an appointment, a question outside the knowledge base, silence, poor audio, and a caller asking for a human. Save expected and actual outcomes so a later configuration or model change can be regression-tested.
2. Calculate total cost at 10 and 20 clients
Include subscriptions, included allowances, overage, telephony, numbers, seats, provider bills, payment fees, and staff time. Compare the same scope across vendors.
Run low, expected, and high-volume cases. A platform with included minutes may look different below and above its allowance, while a wrapper's low fixed subscription may remain attractive until provider usage and support time grow. Record annual-effective discounts separately from month-to-month commitments.
3. Verify compliance documentation
Ask for the actual audit evidence and the contract required for the workflow. A BAA does not replace consent, access control, retention, or secure agency procedures. Avoid treating HIPAA as a certification.
Map the complete data path, including the application, speech and model providers, carrier, integrations, storage, and exports. Confirm which party responds to data-subject or patient requests and how recordings and transcripts can be deleted. Have qualified counsel assess the actual sector and jurisdiction requirements.
4. Test the white-label experience as a client
Check the domain, email, login, invoices, reports, exports, help links, and support path. White-label should hold up beyond the dashboard logo.
Create a test client user with the least privileged role. Verify that the user cannot see other workspaces, vendor-only settings, agency margins, or provider credentials. Review the mobile experience and every automated email that a client may receive.
5. Call support with a real problem
Ask how a wrong knowledge answer, carrier issue, or upstream provider incident is diagnosed. Verify who owns each step and what information the agency can see.
Measure the quality of resolution rather than only the first response. A useful support process preserves the call identifier, timeline, configuration version, provider evidence, and corrective action. Ask how the agency will communicate status when more than one client is affected.
Which Platform Should You Choose?
Choose Trillet when a finished branded service, included usage, unlimited Agency workspaces, and fewer operational handoffs are the priority.
Choose Synthflow when a mature visual builder justifies an Enterprise commitment. Choose Stammer when chat and voice belong in one product. Choose ConvoCore for multi-channel breadth after confirming its deployment route. Choose Thinkrr or Assistable when GHL fit dominates the decision. Choose Frontdesk for a focused receptionist resale model after confirming current commercial terms. Choose a wrapper when low fixed cost and provider choice matter more than consolidating contracts and support.
Make the final decision from a scored proof of concept, a complete cost model, and written commercial terms. Re-run the score after the trial using observed setup hours and call outcomes. A platform that wins the demo but requires more weekly support may be less profitable than a simpler option.
Keep the scoring sheet with the client-service plan so future pricing or feature changes can be evaluated against the original decision rather than by instinct.
Review it before every annual renewal.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the cheapest white-label AI receptionist platform for agencies in 2026?
Voicerr's live $28 Pro headline and Vapify's $29 Starter tier are the lowest public wrapper entry points, but upstream provider usage is separate. VoiceAIWrapper's Pay as You Go plan has no monthly fee, with built-in engine usage of about $0.07 to $0.31 per minute plus telephony, as of October 2026. Trillet Studio costs $99/month with 1,000 included AI minutes for up to 3 workspaces. Compare complete cost at expected client usage.
Do I need HIPAA compliance to resell AI receptionists?
Healthcare workflows involving protected health information may require a BAA and a correctly configured service chain. Requirements depend on the workflow and jurisdiction. Trillet uses a standard BAA process on Agency and Enterprise and displays SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 evidence. Consult counsel for the specific use case.
What is the difference between a wrapper platform and a native platform for AI receptionist reselling?
A wrapper connects its client portal to a separate upstream voice platform. A first-party application operates the voice AI product but can still use carriers, models, speech services, and cloud subprocessors. For an agency, the practical difference is the number of contracts, bills, dashboards, and support boundaries.
How much can agencies charge for an AI receptionist?
There is no universal rate. Price around the value delivered, scope, minutes, integration work, support, compliance obligations, and service-level expectations. Validate willingness to pay in the target vertical before adopting a margin benchmark.
How many clients do I need to be profitable reselling AI receptionists?
Break-even depends on price, usage, telephony, support, acquisition cost, and software overhead. With Trillet Agency, 3,000 AI minutes are included in the $299 subscription; use that allowance before adding $0.12/min overage to the model.
Updated for October 2026: Corrected ConvoCore, Stammer, Assistable, Frontdesk, and Thinkrr details and reclassified VoiceAIWrapper as a built-in engine plus bring-your-own-key platform.




