Industry InsightsUse Cases

Echowin vs Trillet: Which AI Answering Service is Right for You? (2026)

Ming Xu
Ming XuChief Information Officer
Echowin vs Trillet: Which AI Answering Service is Right for You? (2026)

Echowin vs Trillet: Which AI Answering Service is Right for You? (2026)

Trillet offers simpler pricing at $29/month with 150 minutes included, while Echowin uses a credit-based system starting at $49.99/month for approximately 100 minutes.

Both platforms promise 24/7 AI call answering for small businesses, but they take fundamentally different approaches to pricing and features. Trillet focuses on straightforward per-minute billing after your included minutes, while Echowin uses a credit system that can be harder to predict. This comparison breaks down the real differences so you can make the right choice for your business.

Which Trillet product is right for you?

How Does Pricing Compare Between Echowin and Trillet?

Trillet's pricing is simpler: $29/month includes 150 minutes, with $0.20/minute overage. Echowin charges $49.99/month for roughly 100 minutes worth of credits.

The pricing models differ significantly:

Trillet Pricing:

Plan

Monthly Cost

Minutes Included

Overage Rate

Starter

$29/month

150 minutes

$0.20/min

Echowin Pricing:

Plan

Monthly Cost

Credits Included

Effective Per-Minute

Self-Serve

$49.99/month

1,600 credits (~100 mins)

$0.16/min

White Glove (Managed)

Custom

Custom

Volume discounts to $0.12/min

At first glance, Echowin's $0.16/minute rate looks cheaper than Trillet's $0.20/minute overage. But the base plan tells a different story: Trillet gives you 150 minutes for $29, while Echowin gives you about 100 minutes for $49.99. That means Trillet costs 42% less to get started and includes 50% more minutes.

For a business using 200 minutes per month:

Trillet saves you $27/month in this scenario, which adds up to $324/year.

What Features Does Each Platform Offer?

Both platforms handle core AI receptionist functions, but Trillet includes multi-channel support that Echowin charges extra for.

Core features available on both platforms:

Where they differ:

Feature

Trillet

Echowin

SMS conversations

Included

100 free parts/month, then extra

WhatsApp integration

Included

Not available

Credits rollover

N/A (minute-based)

No rollover

Built-in CRM

Via integrations

Included

HIPAA/SOC 2

Included

Managed plans only

Setup method

Website scraping + reviews

Website import only

Trillet's setup process pulls both your website content and business reviews to create a more comprehensive agent knowledge base. This means your AI receptionist understands not just what you offer, but how customers talk about your business.

Which Platform Has Better Compliance Options?

Trillet includes HIPAA and SOC 2 compliance on all plans. Echowin restricts compliance features to managed (custom-priced) plans only.

If you run a healthcare practice, therapy office, or any business handling sensitive patient information, this distinction matters. With Trillet, you get compliant call handling from day one at $29/month. With Echowin, you need to contact sales for a custom managed plan, which typically costs significantly more.

For businesses in regulated industries, Trillet's included compliance can save hundreds of dollars per month compared to Echowin's tiered approach.

How Does Call Quality Compare?

Both platforms deliver sub-second latency, with Echowin claiming under 750ms response times and Trillet achieving similar performance.

Real-world call quality depends on more than latency numbers. Key factors include:

For most small businesses, both platforms deliver acceptable call quality. The difference shows up in edge cases: what happens when a caller asks something unexpected, or when they need to continue a conversation via text.

What About the Credit System vs. Minutes?

Trillet uses straightforward minutes. Echowin uses credits (1 credit equals roughly 1 cent), which can complicate budgeting.

With Trillet, you know exactly what you're paying: included minutes plus a fixed overage rate. Your 150 minutes work the same in January as they do in December.

Echowin's credit system introduces variables:

This complexity isn't necessarily bad for every business, but it makes cost forecasting harder. If you prefer knowing exactly what your phone bill will be each month, Trillet's model is more predictable.

Which Platform is Better for Multi-Location Businesses?

Trillet supports multiple locations with unified management. Echowin's self-serve plan may limit scaling options.

If you run a franchise or have multiple business locations, consider:

Trillet advantages for multi-location:

Echowin considerations:

For businesses planning to grow, Trillet's transparent pricing makes expansion costs predictable. You know exactly what each new location will cost before you add it.

Comparison: Trillet vs Echowin vs Other AI Receptionists

Feature

Trillet

Echowin

Dialzara

Entry price

$29/month

$49.99/month

$29/month

Minutes included

150

~100 (credits)

60

Overage rate

$0.20/min

$0.16/min

$0.48/min

Multi-channel (SMS/WhatsApp)

Included

Limited

No

HIPAA included

Yes

Managed plans only

No

Setup time

5 minutes

5-10 minutes

5-10 minutes

Credits rollover

N/A

No

N/A

Trillet offers the best balance of price, included minutes, and features. Echowin may work for businesses that consistently use high volumes and can negotiate managed plan rates. Dialzara's high overage rate makes it expensive for businesses that exceed their minute allocation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Echowin cheaper than Trillet for high-volume callers?

At very high volumes (500+ minutes/month), Echowin's lower per-minute rate on managed plans could save money. But you'd need to negotiate custom pricing and commit to a managed service. For most small businesses under 300 minutes/month, Trillet costs less.

Does Echowin's built-in CRM replace my existing CRM?

Not necessarily. Echowin includes a basic CRM with lead tracking, but most businesses prefer integrating with their existing CRM (HubSpot, Salesforce, etc.). Both Trillet and Echowin support CRM integrations, so the built-in CRM is more of a nice-to-have than a deciding factor.

Which Trillet product should I choose?

If you're a small business owner looking for AI call answering, start with Trillet AI Receptionist at $29/month. If you're an agency wanting to resell voice AI to clients, explore Trillet White-Label with Studio at $99/month (up to 3 sub-accounts) or Agency at $299/month (unlimited sub-accounts).

Can I switch from Echowin to Trillet easily?

Yes. Trillet's 5-minute setup from your website URL means you can be live on Trillet the same day you decide to switch. There's no complex migration process since your AI agent is built from your website content rather than imported from another platform.

Which platform is better for after-hours calls only?

Both handle after-hours calls well. Trillet's lower base price ($29 vs $49.99) makes it more economical if you only need coverage during specific hours. You can configure business hours and customize how the AI handles calls during different periods.

Conclusion

For most small businesses, Trillet delivers better value than Echowin. You get more minutes at a lower base price ($29 for 150 minutes vs. $49.99 for ~100 minutes), simpler pricing without credits to track, and multi-channel support included rather than limited.

Echowin makes sense for businesses that need very high call volumes and can negotiate managed plan pricing, or those specifically wanting the built-in CRM functionality. But for straightforward AI receptionist needs, Trillet's combination of price, features, and simplicity wins.

Start with Trillet AI Receptionist at $29/month and see how much time you save when every call gets answered. For more on AI receptionist options, see the Complete AI Receptionist Guide or compare AI receptionist pricing models.


Related Resources:

Related Articles

What Is a Voice AI Wrapper?
Industry InsightsUse Cases

What Is a Voice AI Wrapper?

A voice AI wrapper is a software layer that aggregates and rebrands third-party voice AI infrastructure, allowing agencies to resell voice capabilities without building the underlying technology themselves.

Ming Xu
Ming XuChief Information Officer